This features diverse wide range of powder as there is often distinctions. That is nearly identical to the recommendation in every single reloading guide that I've go through. I and I am sure most Other individuals scoff at that in follow and just maintain rolling with what has worked. Nevertheless There have been substantial packaging variations with WW231 through the years. I have only been using the stuff given that 1991 and have 3 diverse canisters in my assortment, but no aged inventory powder.
You've got a great deal of decisions in reloading & It could be great if they ended up often accessible, but I uncovered it is important to keep a reloading log with facts & exam effects. I realize something, when the next disaster/shortage hits (or the subsequent election) I may have a three year offer readily available to temperature it.
If I could get my arms on some CFE I might love to test it on 9mm. CFE worked extremely very well for my forty five ACP and 38 Distinctive loads (fired by way of a GP100).
Any transform they make to a powder will alter It can be melt away qualities. As an example, BE86 is equivalent in every way to Electrical power Pistol, apart from owning an additional flash suppressant, which results in it to burn somewhat quicker. I can not consider They are even now building 231/HP38 the same precise way they did in 1978.
We do present bulk orders and special bulk pricing. Please Speak to us straight to inquiry about portions and pricing.
Evidently powder earning just isn't actual as tons really(often appreciably). Probably they tested a whole lot on the high-end of your spectrum and you've got quite a bit for the lower end.
I do see load information for HP38 but just wanting to know why it isn't preferred? I believe It can be clean burning and is rated at about the same melt away rate as the BEye I that I generally use... Why can it be not being used much? I load forty Significant 180gr for Confined and 9mm Minimal 125 & 147gr for Output.
I termed that adequate, gave the look of the prudent matter to carry out. Was my chronograph Completely wrong? Difference in chamber spec, book facts substantial finish, mine with the compact end? No method of understanding. I had no extreme force symptoms other than the higher than predicted velocity.
Flake powders are rather spherical, and uniform. A great deal can in good shape right into a situation. Over you'll at any time have to have. This HP38 powde helps make this powder additional risky when you produce a reloading error.
. And to not use to be a similar equal powder reference from a substantial experienced explosives company? I believe not.
Think it over—you’ve got 40 in addition 12 months aged cans (each HP-38 and 231) represented by RCBS details then, nonetheless sitting in garages and on shelves, together with new powder, or like many of my powders which are very easily five to ten several years outdated, and simply of various tons, so can you really phone them the exact same?
"A govt big enough to provide you with all the things you wish hp-38 powder is actually a government large enough to take from you all the things you might have." G.R. Ford
To even start to know Should they be exactly the same or near glimpse to in which the powder was built around the bottle.
The remarkable characteristic of HP-38, in my ordeals, would be the extremely broad spectrum of various handgun cartridges, nicely about 25 by my rely, and that there's an abundance of loading info out there from respected resources, which includes Wolfe Publishing’s have LoadData.com.